🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.