🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. As time has passed, an observance that was initiated as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has adopted a corporate feel, growing to encompass functions where individuals of African heritage are paid to speak with predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The surge has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The observance has evolved since that time, placing less emphasis on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the celebration is observed is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how important it is to rethink Black History Month more than the specific period in which it falls this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels emboldened to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in Europe as a complete entity.

In the America, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been carried, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A effort to erase the history of people of color and legacy from the records is in progress. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the month illustrates how insufficiently it can be effective if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or depoliticized celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the situation of the present. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is needed. Denise Miller, a educator at University of Greenwich, put it best when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just do away with observances such as Black History Month completely, assuming they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an period that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an framework that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out through the year (as various establishments are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not avoid political issues, and leaves space for people, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What value has mere awareness of the bygone era when it fails to address the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Institutions who observe it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and awareness of “microaggressions”, but confronted with the risks that face all if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and responsive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is in order – Black History is Now Month.